Go to content
Move forward with confidence. Contact Watson Goepel LLP today. Call 604.688.1301.

Micah Goldberg

“Understanding my client’s goals and interests is the key to my practice.”

Contact Info

Assistant Info

Name:

Mikaella Tababa

Micah Goldberg* is a Partner in the Litigation & Dispute Resolution Group at Watson Goepel. He maintains a commercial litigation practice with a focus on property and commercial litigation. Micah’s property practice involves co-ownership disputes brought pursuant to the Partition of Property Act in which his published decisions are frequently cited as leading precedent in the legal area. His commercial litigation practice involves contractual disputes including partnership and shareholder disputes, contractual claims, bank/wire fraud tracing and asset recovery.

Micah is retained by government entities and private clients. He has appeared as lead counsel in matters before the Supreme Court of British Columbia and British Columbia Court of Appeal, and represented clients in arbitrations and various administrative tribunals and hearings. He has been recognized by Best Lawyers Ones to Watch since 2025.

Education

  • J.D., University of Victoria, 2015
  • B.A. (Philosophy, with High Distinction), University of Toronto, 2011

Bar

  • British Columbia, 2016

Work Highlights

  • Property Litigation
    • Commenced proceedings and appeals concerning the compelled sale of co-owned property pursuant to the Partition of Property Act.
    • Provided strategic advice to joint owners of property in respect of their rights and entitlements to settle matters and avoid litigation.
    • Advanced and defended applications to remove and preserve certificates of pending litigation on title to residential and commercial properties.
    • Resisted an appeal concerning an investment property governed by a joint venture agreement.

  • Securities Litigation and Wire Fraud Tracing
    • Provided assistance and advice to public and private companies, options-holders, shareholders and other individuals regarding the overall validity and enforceability of corporate contracts.
    • Successfully obtained Norwich orders and other tracing remedies to identify, freeze, and recover misappropriated funds transferred through complex banking and wire fraud schemes.
    • Recovered millions of dollars in assets for corporate victims of fraud through the use of anti-fraud legislation and litigation procedures.

  • Shareholder/Partnership Disputes and Employment Litigation
    • Litigated disputes between shareholders, partners, and joint venturers with and without governing documents.
    • Provided strategic advice to executive-level employees and employers regarding the use of the oppression remedy and the amendment of shareholder governing documents.
    • Resolved and settled matters that involved consideration of wrongful terminations and shareholder and partnership rights.

Publications and Presentations

  • Panelist at CBABC Property Law Section Meetings
  • Faculty at CLEBC Employment Law Conference and Residential Real Estate Conference
  • Co-author of “Broadening the Horizons of Employment Law: A Comparative Review of Ontario Notice Periods”

Professional and Community Affiliations

  • Chair, Property Law Section, Canadian Bar Association – BC
  • Member, Truth & Reconciliation Committee, Canadian Bar Association – BC
  • President, British Columbia Civil Discourse Society
  • Volunteer Lawyer, Access Pro Bono

Recognition

  • Recognized since 2025 in Best Lawyers® for ‘Ones to Watch’ in Canada for work in Corporate and Commercial Litigation.

*Practicing through a Professional Law Corporation.

Recent news from Micah Goldberg

View All
  • Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Approving a Sale of Co-Owned Properties: What the Purssell v. Purssell Decision Means for Partition of Property Act Proceedings

Micah Goldberg

Our firm’s recent success in Purssell v. Purssell, 2026 BCCA 328, provides useful guidance on the factors a judge will consider when approving a sale sought in Partition of Property Act (PPA) proceedings. Namely, that an approval judge must consider the background that gave rise to the original order for sale.

Read More